Ilai Montiel here. Behold, my username, the offspring of wit and the lack of creativity. I come bearing gifts manifesting as a video and a pretty picture that will, hopefully, pique your interest enough that you shall formulate and submit comments that will trigger highly engaging conversations and discussions. Think first, judge later.
Moving on.
Let's start off by closing our eyes (Wait up! Not yet! I've yet to deliver the rest of the instructions). Breathe in, breathe out. Now picture Earth, third rock from the sun, that beautiful blue marble, streaks and puffs of clouds hovering over patches of blue and green. Earth, floating in the endless blackness of space accompanied only by Luna. Done? Now click on the link. Yes, this
blue thing is the link.
Ah! Your mind says. It's planet Earth! Or rather, that was at first glance. Two seconds in, it doesn't look like pretty ol' Terra anymore. Likely you saw the word "Mars" at the start of the video and was a little thrown off when you saw a green-blue sphere, expecting to see a dead red ball of said name.
But yes. That rotating rock you see before you is Mars.
Or more specifically, how Mars will appear once fully terraformed. Terraformation is a hypothetical process in which a planet or moon is transformed, engineered, to be much like Earth, with vegetation and streams and lakes and seas and animals.
At this point, you're probably asking, "Okay, cool, but why on Mars should we?"
Innumerable reasons, to both why and why not.
Supporters argue that the red planet presents remedy for the growing demand and population, particularly because of its proximity to the asteroid belt, which contain metals and minerals that would otherwise be rare and depleted on Earth, and to become human habitat to prevent population overload on the basis that Earth can only efficiently support a few billion people (studies are unable to reach an agreement on Earth's carrying capacity, but estimates vary from 4 to 10 billion humans). Also, terraforming the planet will be less expensive and far safer than simply colonizing it in
enclosed fragile domes.
However, on the anti-terraforming side of the debate, it is argued that there is no guarantee that the altered Martian environment will remain. Certainly, the amount of time it will take to fully terraform Mars is anybody's guess. Perhaps a few hundred years, perhaps a couple thousand. The cost could outweigh the gains. Besides that, the Martian land is dangerous, battered sometimes by solar radiation due to its very thin atmosphere, occasionally covered by planetwide dust storms, and the effects of its low gravity (only 38% that of Earth's) on humans and other animals are unknown. Others simply argue that humans do not have the right to change whole worlds for their own use.
Hmm, Indeed. Take a few minutes to think, and then let's talk! Is it worth it? Is preserving Mars' and other planets' natural landscapes more important than ensuring the long-term survival and spread of humanity? Should humans stay on Earth? Do humans have the right? Who has the say-so in colonization and terraformation of other worlds?
Are you a Red (against), or are you a Green (for)?